 |
|

12-10-2021, 08:10 PM
|
 |
232 I6
|
|
Join Date: Sep 14, 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 61
|
|
Body swap
Will the body from a 63 J200 bolt onto a later (80-87) chassis ?
|

12-10-2021, 08:53 PM
|
 |
258 I6
|
|
Join Date: Oct 02, 2011
Location: Lake of the Ozarks
Posts: 259
|
|
From what I see the 1963 J200 has a wheelbase of 120" but the Wagoneer has a wheelbase of 110". That would not be a very good fit. You can sneak an inch or two and make things look pretty normal, but not 10".....Just for info, the 1997-2002 F-150 short bed regular cab has a wheelbase of 120.2". That would be easier to match.
__________________
1970 Wagoneer Custom (9/1969)
Original Arizona Jeep
Buick 350/TH400/Dana20
Early model with razor grill
Spring Green exterior (original)
Custom series interior
|

12-11-2021, 01:00 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 08, 2004
Location: Willamette Valley, OR
Posts: 5,177
|
|
Think he's asking about a truck chassis, not Wagoneer, since he only went to '87.
__________________
Art
ASE Master Collision Tech
"Beast" - 81 "S" W/T, 85-360, T-18, Lock-rite,wag alloys, 31-10.50 Pro Comp MT's, Warn 8274 in a fabbed bumper/deer strainer(tested and approved)
88 XJ, 3" lift, 31-10.50's, custom bumpers and winch/tow bar mounts, Warn 9500HS, custom sliders/steps, camo paint, & headliner
Member: FSJ Prissy Restoration Assoc.
|

12-11-2021, 05:30 AM
|
 |
327 Rambler
|
|
Join Date: Feb 09, 2014
Location: Schoorl ,the Nederlands
Posts: 538
|
|
There is a thread about truck frame differences somewhere on this forum.
If I remember correctly the cab mounts on the frame are on a different place and height on the later years.
__________________
Jeep "because mother nature hates flat roads to"
http://www.ifsja.org/forums/vb/showthread.php?t=180974
99' Dodge ram 2500 4x4 crew cab 5.9 Cummins ,backup work truck for now
73' Jeep J4000 (named Heep or Desert Dragon) amc 360 V8 converted to LPG with T15/D20 (was my daily work truck for thirteen years and is going to have major overhaul
80' Jeep cj5 350 V8 Chevy/sm420/D300 project
70/71 Jeep J4000 parts truck with Buick 350
Trucks/car's from the past:
85' Volkswagen caddy mk1 1.6 diesel.
83 Toyota land cruiser BJ42 3.4 diesel.
|

12-11-2021, 05:37 AM
|
 |
327 Rambler
|
|
Join Date: Feb 09, 2014
Location: Schoorl ,the Nederlands
Posts: 538
|
|
Well some say there is no difference and some say there is!
Have a read through this thread,
http://www.ifsja.org/forums/vb/showthread.php?t=38992
__________________
Jeep "because mother nature hates flat roads to"
http://www.ifsja.org/forums/vb/showthread.php?t=180974
99' Dodge ram 2500 4x4 crew cab 5.9 Cummins ,backup work truck for now
73' Jeep J4000 (named Heep or Desert Dragon) amc 360 V8 converted to LPG with T15/D20 (was my daily work truck for thirteen years and is going to have major overhaul
80' Jeep cj5 350 V8 Chevy/sm420/D300 project
70/71 Jeep J4000 parts truck with Buick 350
Trucks/car's from the past:
85' Volkswagen caddy mk1 1.6 diesel.
83 Toyota land cruiser BJ42 3.4 diesel.
|

12-11-2021, 11:42 AM
|
 |
350 Buick
|
|
Join Date: Aug 11, 2004
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,072
|
|
I think form the radiator to the back of a truck cab, they are the same, or the front half basically.
__________________
"Roads? Where we're going we don't need roads." -- Dr Emmett Brown
"When this baby reaches 88 miles per hour, you're gonna to see some serious sh  t!"
73 Wagoneer - 4.6L Stroker (yeah baby!!) t176/d300, 3.73's, 33" muds, 4"spring lift, 2" body. Offy dualport w/ Quadrajet, pertronix, flowmaster.
|

12-11-2021, 01:12 PM
|
350 Buick
|
|
Join Date: Sep 17, 2005
Location: Farmington Hills Mi.
Posts: 1,360
|
|
There is definitely a difference in the cab mounting. A significant change occurred in the 1976 frames that included the steering gear and cab mounting structure as well as other features.
The cab mounting brackets have a larger hole and are placed at a different Z height on the later frames. I also believe they maybe in a different Location so the bolts will not align with an older cab.
Another little known difference is the second crossmember mounting location. There is a slight change that occurred in 1980 on the location of the holes in the frame where the transmission crossmember attaches. This change is to accommodate the New Process transfercase that was introduced that year.
|

12-14-2021, 05:11 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Oct 31, 2016
Location: Camarillo, CA
Posts: 4,651
|
|
the Wago/Chero frames are VERY different than the J10/J20 chassis from about the middle of the doors back. The J10/J20 chassis is a few inches wider. If you look in the back of the field service manual, there are diagrams of the chassis's with measurements and you can see where the cab mounts are in different spots and the chassis is wider. I also believe the gas tank mounts are very different.
I learned this when I bought an axle from a J10 and it WOULD NOT bolt into my Cherokee WT. The spring perches on the J10 axle were about 1.5" wider per side.
__________________
79 Cherokee Chief (SOLD, goodbye old buddy) 
( Cherokee Build Thread)
11 Nissan Pathfinder Silver Edition 4x4
09 Mazdaspeed3 Grand Touring 
00 Baby Cherokee
|

12-15-2021, 10:43 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: May 29, 2003
Location: Medford MA USA
Posts: 11,580
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rang-a-stang
the Wago/Chero frames are VERY different than the J10/J20 chassis from about the middle of the doors back. The J10/J20 chassis is a few inches wider. If you look in the back of the field service manual, there are diagrams of the chassis's with measurements and you can see where the cab mounts are in different spots and the chassis is wider. I also believe the gas tank mounts are very different.
I learned this when I bought an axle from a J10 and it WOULD NOT bolt into my Cherokee WT. The spring perches on the J10 axle were about 1.5" wider per side.
|
Yes, this is a part with the bed width. A J-truck rear axle is wider than the front, allowing a 4' distance between the inner wheel wells. The Utility Trucks are the same way. I presume this is mostly so that 4x8 sheet goods will lay flat in the bed. Very few vehicles have this sort of wider rear axle, since it modestly increases the turning radius. Better tracking, less maneuverable, supposedly. Almost all cars and trucks nave a narrower rear track than front.
__________________
Tim Reese
Maine beekeeper's truck: '77 J10 LWB, 258/T15/D20/3.54 bone stock, low options (delete radio), PS, hubcaps.
Browless and proud: '82 J20 360/T18/NP208/3.73, Destination ATs, 7600 GVWR
Copper Polly: '75 CJ-6, 304/T15, PS, BFG KM2s, soft top
GTI without the badges: '95 VW Golf Sport 2000cc 2D
ECO Green: '15 FCA Jeep Cherokee KL Trailhawk
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:48 PM.
|