If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
'84 GW with Nissan SD33T, early Chev NV4500, 300, narrowed Ford reverse 44, narrowed Ford 60, SOA/reversed shackle in fornt, lowered mount/flipped shackle in rear.
I thought the tone of my prose indicated I didn't thing grease was a good idea but more for the gumming up reason. Yeah a guy could over apply it but that wasn't my concern.
The graphite paint I would have to be talked into. I don't think it would hold up in a this application and though it's thin when properly applied it still has to go somewhere when it fails and the disc is the likely landing place as you say.
So clean and dry it is. I guess I was wondering if anyone was going to argue for the goo.
Sic friatur crustulum
'84 GW with Nissan SD33T, early Chev NV4500, 300, narrowed Ford reverse 44, narrowed Ford 60, SOA/reversed shackle in fornt, lowered mount/flipped shackle in rear.
I have used anti-seize before on over the road tractor clutches that I knew were running in the salt and sleet for long periods, but it was a very thin film.
I have used a very thin film of grease to aid in assembly without any negative side effects. As stated, it would be easy to use too much but a thin film seemed to help when I was putting everything back together.
I do not think the graphite paint would work in this application.
Comment