 |
|

10-20-2013, 06:37 PM
|
Noob!
|
|
Join Date: May 24, 2007
Posts: 10
|
|
'71/'72 360 rebuild questions --stroker
Greetings,
I have a stock 360 motor (in a J2000) that I'd like to rebuild if it
looks nice upon disassembly.
Has anyone done a rebuild on one of these with an aftermarket (maybe a Stroker) kit?
The air injection on mine has been deleted; I don't plan on putting it back, for simplicty.
Thanks
|

10-21-2013, 12:02 AM
|
 |
304 AMC
|
|
Join Date: Nov 18, 2009
Location: France (burgundy)
Posts: 2,025
|
|
71 ? so you have one o the first j2000 with a 360. Do you have a VIN and production date (door jamb sticker) ?
You'll find rebuild kit by maddog (ebay) or others, but unlike the later 6cyl 4.0L, no vendors for a 360 stroker kit. Some have stroked a 360 with a 401 crankshaft though, you should find a post here 
__________________
J10 sportside '81, J10 Golden Eagle '77, Wagoneer '65, Gladiator '64 + parts rigs
Last edited by mud89 : 10-21-2013 at 12:04 AM.
|

10-25-2013, 09:07 PM
|
Noob!
|
|
Join Date: May 24, 2007
Posts: 10
|
|
From the Data Plate:
J2M241WN13054
The engine # is not in front of me right now;
last I checked it listed as a '71 made late in the year...
'N' ...
Thanks for the input.
Cheers.
|

10-26-2013, 11:18 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 12, 2011
Location: Gold Bar, WA
Posts: 6,474
|
|
Check the crank isn't the flat flange. AMC changed the crank in '72 for 727/9XX trans.
__________________
 Jeep gauges are for amusement only. Any correlation between them and reality is purely coincidental.
|

10-27-2013, 01:44 PM
|
 |
304 AMC
|
|
Join Date: Nov 18, 2009
Location: France (burgundy)
Posts: 2,025
|
|
It's an early '72 built in 1971
|

10-27-2013, 02:03 PM
|
 |
The Nigel Tufnel of the FSJ world.
|
|
Join Date: Jan 09, 2011
Location: Not The Hot Part, Arizona
Posts: 4,022
|
|
Early 1971 heads are high compression (291c). I think it was around 9.2.
Late 1971 are standard 8.5 compression heads.
The actual performance difference between them is nil.
__________________
'72 Jeep Wagoneer Custom, 360 V8
I love how arguements end as soon as Ristow comments. Ristow is right...again.
|

10-27-2013, 02:23 PM
|
 |
350 Buick
|
|
Join Date: Jul 29, 2002
Location: Divorce is hell
Posts: 1,229
|
|
so a 77 is low compression too ...?
__________________
64 Wagoneer 283 SBC
50 truck
63 J-200 Truck -- free
Please, if you believe in the power of prayer, God and Jesus Christ... I beg you add my relationship with Heather Boyd to be reconciled to a new, stronger than ever, wonderful marriage ... to your prayer list and remember us daily.
Addendum:
And now that im getting Divorced .. i want to work on it , but no one else does -- ^ -- Heather, please leave your affair with Josh Smith and come back to the father of your children
|

10-27-2013, 03:31 PM
|
 |
The Nigel Tufnel of the FSJ world.
|
|
Join Date: Jan 09, 2011
Location: Not The Hot Part, Arizona
Posts: 4,022
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike D
so a 77 is low compression too ...?
|
Somewhere in the 8.25-8.5 range, yes. 1977 will also have 1.5 ratio bridged rockers.
__________________
'72 Jeep Wagoneer Custom, 360 V8
I love how arguements end as soon as Ristow comments. Ristow is right...again.
|

10-27-2013, 05:57 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 20, 2006
Location: The Great Googley Moogley Midwest.
Posts: 17,265
|
|
they're 1.6. i have yet to see 1.5 rockers on an AMC.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hankrod
Ristows right.................again,
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fasts79Chief
... like the little 'you know what's' that you are.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fasts79Chief
I LOVE how Ristow has stolen my comment about him ... "Quoted" it ... and made himself famous for being an ***hole to people. Hahahahahahahahahha!
|
→ Where the kids hang out...
fsjbuilder.org come for the mindless chat,stay for the hand drawn emoticons.
It's like you're unraveling a big cable-knit sweater that someone keeps knitting...and knitting...and knitting...and knitting...
|

10-27-2013, 07:04 PM
|
 |
350 Buick
|
|
Join Date: Jul 29, 2002
Location: Divorce is hell
Posts: 1,229
|
|
dont know what that means ..
__________________
64 Wagoneer 283 SBC
50 truck
63 J-200 Truck -- free
Please, if you believe in the power of prayer, God and Jesus Christ... I beg you add my relationship with Heather Boyd to be reconciled to a new, stronger than ever, wonderful marriage ... to your prayer list and remember us daily.
Addendum:
And now that im getting Divorced .. i want to work on it , but no one else does -- ^ -- Heather, please leave your affair with Josh Smith and come back to the father of your children
|

10-27-2013, 07:49 PM
|
 |
The Nigel Tufnel of the FSJ world.
|
|
Join Date: Jan 09, 2011
Location: Not The Hot Part, Arizona
Posts: 4,022
|
|
I always thought the stud rockers were 1.6 and the bridged were 1.5. If you look at lobe lift specifications, they increased lobe lift the same time they changed over the rockers, but the 1.5 ratio brings valve liftto the same specification as before.
__________________
'72 Jeep Wagoneer Custom, 360 V8
I love how arguements end as soon as Ristow comments. Ristow is right...again.
|

10-27-2013, 08:40 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 12, 2011
Location: Gold Bar, WA
Posts: 6,474
|
|
Here's the difference. '71 AMC cars (AMXs and Javelins at least) got 10.5:1 compression option. (photo isn't mine. It's "borrowed")

__________________
 Jeep gauges are for amusement only. Any correlation between them and reality is purely coincidental.
|

10-28-2013, 04:49 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 20, 2006
Location: The Great Googley Moogley Midwest.
Posts: 17,265
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FSJunkie
I always thought the stud rockers were 1.6 and the bridged were 1.5. If you look at lobe lift specifications, they increased lobe lift the same time they changed over the rockers, but the 1.5 ratio brings valve liftto the same specification as before.
|
they were all 1.6. but i believe there is a listing from amc for 1.5 in one or two years,but i've never seen them or had someone say they had either. maybe some emissions application for california or something. i'll see if i can find it.
the cam changes were more likely for epa regs.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hankrod
Ristows right.................again,
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fasts79Chief
... like the little 'you know what's' that you are.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fasts79Chief
I LOVE how Ristow has stolen my comment about him ... "Quoted" it ... and made himself famous for being an ***hole to people. Hahahahahahahahahha!
|
→ Where the kids hang out...
fsjbuilder.org come for the mindless chat,stay for the hand drawn emoticons.
It's like you're unraveling a big cable-knit sweater that someone keeps knitting...and knitting...and knitting...and knitting...
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:11 AM.
|